Criminology????????????????????
Question by kayta k: criminology????????????????????
The warrants were granted. The arrest warrants for Mendoza and Manning particularly described the individuals to be arrested. The search warrant gave the street address, and indicated that the objects to be seized were drugs, drug related paraphernalia, hard copy pays and owes [notations of narcotic transactions], cash, and weapons.
You and a team from the Drug Interdiction Task Force deployed to the Manning residence shortly after noon on November 14. When you approached the front door you found that it was partially open. You could see approximately sixty well dressed citizens of Fresno, many of whom were recognizable to you. They had gathered around the pool and were enjoying the hospitality of the event.
Rather than knocking on the door and announcing your presence and purpose, you immediately entered with the remaining officers, and ordered everyone present to “freeze.” Mendoza was easily identified and arrested at a temporary bar located near the pool. A search of his person revealed a .40 Glock automatic, and a vial containing power cocaine in one of his pockets.
When asked where Manning was, Mendoza replied, “in his office,” and nodded toward an area down a hallway. You proceeded in that direction while other officers looked in closets, under beds, and behind drapes and furniture for persons who might represent a danger or interfere with the execution of the warrants.
You found Manning seated at a desk working on a lap top computer. He was handcuffed, and taken to a waiting police vehicle. After he was removed you went through his desk, and a briefcase which contained only a spiral notebook and what appeared to be some legal files. The briefcase and laptop were seized and taken to the property division.
In accordance with a protocol which you had established and announced to law enforcement participants, all of those present were temporarily seated and handcuffed, much to the chagrin of the Director of the Fresno Philharmonic, the President of the Chamber of Commerce, and the Chairman of Fres-Yes who was to present a bid for the 2014 Winter Olympics. All protested loudly about their treatment and promised retribution.
Those who identified themselves as security personnel were frisked. The process resulted in the recovery of a number of hand guns and other miscellaneous weapons.
A check of “wants and warrants” for those present revealed an outstanding traffic warrant for one hospitality worker. She was arrested, and a search of her apron resulted in the recovery of a small quantity of marijuana.
Charmaigne Manning was found in a bedroom she described as her own which had only feminine décor. Beside her was a small bowl with a powdery substance believed to be cocaine. She was taken into custody for possession.
Gradually, the guests were identified and allowed to depart.
A systematic search of the home failed to reveal any contraband, but entry into a door for what turned out to be the maid’s quarters resulted in the discovery of 10 kilos of marijuana.
On the driveway to the property officers searched Mendoza’s red Cadillac Escalade, and found another 10 kilos of marijuana in the trunk together with the $ 10,000 of marked buy money.
At the jail, during the booking procedures, you went through the briefcase again, with particular interest in the spiral bound notebook. In its pages were notations relating to a number of criminal offenses including jury tampering, corruption, and bribery. The laptop contained records of various drug related transactions together with a memorandum indicating that 20 kilos were to be delivered to Medrano on November 14.
1True orFalseUnder the logic and reasoning in United States v Leon, your
search of the entire premises at 3297 Oak Ridge
Best answer:
Answer by Leslie S
US vs. Leon has nothing to do with this scenario.
It was about evidence being good or bad (court said good) after a search via search warrant when the search warrant turned out to be judged later as not good enough but was sought and issued in “good faith”.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Why should I go to Tony Miller and Crew? – ~~~Recendezgroup.com~~~ ~~http To schedule a appointment with Tony and Crew please call him @ 559.432.9296. The newest and best truly professional products are created by stylist staying up on the latest advances in solutions that are highly superior to those sold in drug stores. Those you see on drug store shelves are owned by huge corporations and are tired old solutions compared to the new ones. I’ll tell you about Organic Perms-Beechy Waves-Keratin Fusion treatment to add body to fine hair and a really exciting breakthrough, not yet released.
Lawsuit filed in Calif. over Brockovich chemical
Filed under: Fresno Drug Treatment
FRESNO, Calif. (AP) — Environmental groups filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against the California Department of Public Health for failing to establish a safe drinking water standard for the cancer-causing chemical made famous in the film ''Erin Brockovich …
Read more on Boston.com
Saunders allows 9 earned runs in loss to Marlins
Filed under: Fresno Drug Treatment
Thursday Night Showdown Scholar-Athlete of the Week · Fresno Monsters · Fresno City College · Visalia Rawhide · San Jose Sharks · Worcester Sharks · Fresno Fuego … NASCAR has reinstated Aaron Fike, the Truck Series driver who was suspended in 2007 …
Read more on KMPH Fox 26